On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:30:18AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:28:10PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:42:48PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > > On 2021-Aug-16, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > > > > > > Here's the reversal patch for the 14 branch. (It applies cleanly to > > > > master, but the unused member of PgStat_StatTabEntry needs to be > > > > removed and catversion bumped). > > > > > > I have pushed this to both branches. (I did not remove the item from > > > the release notes in the 14 branch.) > > > > | I retained the addition of relkind 'p' to tables included by > > | pg_stat_user_tables, because reverting that would require a catversion > > | bump. > > > > Right now, on v15dev, it shows 0, which is misleading. > > Shouldn't it be null ? > > > > analyze_count | 0 > > > > Note that having analyze_count and last_analyze would be an an independently > > useful change. Since parent tables aren't analyzed automatically, I have a > > script to periodically process them if they weren't processed recently. > > Right > > now, for partitioned tables, the best I could find is to check its > > partitions: > > | MIN(last_analyzed) FROM pg_stat_all_tables psat JOIN pg_inherits i ON > > psat.relid=i.inhrelid > > > > In 20200418050815.ge26...@telsasoft.com I wrote: > > |This patch includes partitioned tables in pg_stat_*_tables, which is > > great; I > > |complained awhile ago that they were missing [0]. It might be useful if > > that > > |part was split out into a separate 0001 patch (?). > > | [0] > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180601221428.GU5164%40telsasoft.com > > I suggest the attached (which partially reverts the revert), to allow showing > correct data for analyze_count and last_analyzed.
Álvaro, would you comment on this ? To me this could be an open item, but someone else should make that determination. -- Justin