On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:30:18AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:28:10PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 05:42:48PM -0400, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > On 2021-Aug-16, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Here's the reversal patch for the 14 branch.  (It applies cleanly to
> > > > master, but the unused member of PgStat_StatTabEntry needs to be
> > > > removed and catversion bumped).
> > > 
> > > I have pushed this to both branches.  (I did not remove the item from
> > > the release notes in the 14 branch.)
> > 
> > |    I retained the addition of relkind 'p' to tables included by
> > |    pg_stat_user_tables, because reverting that would require a catversion
> > |    bump.
> > 
> > Right now, on v15dev, it shows 0, which is misleading.
> > Shouldn't it be null ?
> > 
> > analyze_count       | 0
> > 
> > Note that having analyze_count and last_analyze would be an an independently
> > useful change.  Since parent tables aren't analyzed automatically, I have a
> > script to periodically process them if they weren't processed recently.  
> > Right
> > now, for partitioned tables, the best I could find is to check its 
> > partitions:
> > | MIN(last_analyzed) FROM pg_stat_all_tables psat JOIN pg_inherits i ON 
> > psat.relid=i.inhrelid
> > 
> > In 20200418050815.ge26...@telsasoft.com I wrote:
> > |This patch includes partitioned tables in pg_stat_*_tables, which is 
> > great; I
> > |complained awhile ago that they were missing [0].  It might be useful if 
> > that
> > |part was split out into a separate 0001 patch (?).
> > | [0] 
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180601221428.GU5164%40telsasoft.com
> 
> I suggest the attached (which partially reverts the revert), to allow showing
> correct data for analyze_count and last_analyzed.

Álvaro, would you comment on this ?

To me this could be an open item, but someone else should make that
determination.

-- 
Justin


Reply via email to