On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:33:37PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > That's looks like a domino falling. I had the following result, which > looks fine. > > "WAL-Ranges": [ > { "Timeline": 6, "Start-LSN": "0/630C7E8", "End-LSN": "0/630C850" }, > { "Timeline": 5, "Start-LSN": "0/630C780", "End-LSN": "0/630C7E8" }, > { "Timeline": 4, "Start-LSN": "0/630C718", "End-LSN": "0/630C780" }, > { "Timeline": 3, "Start-LSN": "0/630C6B0", "End-LSN": "0/630C718" }, > { "Timeline": 2, "Start-LSN": "0/5000028", "End-LSN": "0/630C6B0" } > ], > > 00000006.history: > 1 0/173F268 no recovery target specified > 2 0/630C6B0 no recovery target specified > 3 0/630C718 no recovery target specified > 4 0/630C780 no recovery target specified > 5 0/630C7E8 no recovery target specified
And your backup_label shows 0/5000028 as start LSN for the backup, right? I see the same result. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature