On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 03:33:37PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> That's looks like a domino falling. I had the following result, which
> looks fine.
> 
> "WAL-Ranges": [
> { "Timeline": 6, "Start-LSN": "0/630C7E8", "End-LSN": "0/630C850" },
> { "Timeline": 5, "Start-LSN": "0/630C780", "End-LSN": "0/630C7E8" },
> { "Timeline": 4, "Start-LSN": "0/630C718", "End-LSN": "0/630C780" },
> { "Timeline": 3, "Start-LSN": "0/630C6B0", "End-LSN": "0/630C718" },
> { "Timeline": 2, "Start-LSN": "0/5000028", "End-LSN": "0/630C6B0" }
> ],
> 
> 00000006.history:
> 1     0/173F268       no recovery target specified
> 2     0/630C6B0       no recovery target specified
> 3     0/630C718       no recovery target specified
> 4     0/630C780       no recovery target specified
> 5     0/630C7E8       no recovery target specified

And your backup_label shows 0/5000028 as start LSN for the backup,
right?  I see the same result.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to