On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:49 AM Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > There was some disagreement during the development of verify_heapam on this > point. We went with the idea that the user could find and inspect the > corrupt data with another tool if they had the (blockno, offnum, attnum) > information. As such, it wasn't necessary to include all the data in the > output.
I find that kind of dubious. By definition you're never supposed to see any verify_heapam errors. If you do end up seeing one, it should be exceptional -- something that you'll learn from. High verbosity makes a lot of sense here. -- Peter Geoghegan
