Em ter., 17 de ago. de 2021 às 10:22, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 9:13 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If that's conditions happen, all *result.index* touches are garbage. > > > > The patch looks valid to me, as the "index" member is not set in the > "btp == NULL" case, and so has a junk value in the caller, and it's > being used to index an array, > BUT - isn't it also necessary to set the "split_pages" member to 0, > because it also is not currently being set, and so too will have a > junk value in this case (and it's possible for it to be referenced by > the caller in this case). > I agree. Attached new version (v1). regards, Ranier Vilela
fix_unitialized_var_index_freepage-v1.patch
Description: Binary data
