On Friday, August 13, 2021, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > The one thing I could potentially see us doing is more strongly > encouraging the use of the names "timestamp" and "timestamptz", > up to and including changing what format_type() et al. put out.
+1. Having the canonical form be timestamptz would make pretending the “with time zone” version doesn’t exist much easier. David J.
