On 8/11/21 1:35 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 9:32 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jk...@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Please ensure you have your feedback in no later than midnight today
>> (Aug 11) AoE[1].
> 
> I think that the pg_upgrade item should say that we now avoid forcing
> an anti-wraparound VACUUM on upgrade. This was never necessary.

How about:

* `pg_upgrade` now carries forward the old installation's `oldestXID`
value, which can improve things from a performance standpoint by no
longer forcing an anti-wraparound `VACUUM`.

?

Jonathan

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to