On 8/10/21 11:27 PM, 孙诗浩(思才) wrote: > we can use regular expressions (<>|!=) to cover "<>" and "!=". > There is no > need to have two definitions less_greater and not_equals, because it > will confuse developer. > So, we can use only not_equals to cover this operator set. > >
I don't understand the problem being solved here. This looks like a change with no discernable benefit. I don't agree that the current code is substantially more likely to confuse developers. And the lexer is not something that gets a lot of change. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
