Dear Meskes and any hackers, > Yes, at least technically. I think DESCRIBE should accept the cached > connection name, although it won't really matter.
I sought docs too and I found that Pro*C have such a same policy, so it might be reasonable: https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/21/lnpcc/Oracle-dynamic-SQL.html#GUID-0EB50EB7-D4C8-401D-AFCD-340D281711C4 Anyway I revised patches again in the current spec. I separated them into 6 parts: 0001: move "connection = NULL" to top rule. This is per Wang. 0002: adds supporting deallocate statement. 0003: adds supporting describe statement. The above and this are main parts. 0004: adds warning then the connection is overwritten. This is per Horiguchi-san. 0005: adds warning then the connection is overwritten. This is per Horiguchi-san and Paquier. 0006: adds some tests. 0001 is the solution of follows: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OSBPR01MB42141999ED8EFDD4D8FDA42CF2E29%40OSBPR01MB4214.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com This bug is caused because "connection = NULL" is missing is missing in some cases, so I force to substitute NULL in the statement: rule, the top-level in the parse tree. I also remove the substitution from output.c because such line is overlapped. If you think this change is too large, I can erase 0001 and add a substitution to the end part of ECPGCursorStmt rule. That approach is also resolve the bug and impact is very small. 0004 is an optional patch, this is not related with DEALLOCATE and DESCRIBE. We were discussing about how should work when followings are pre-compiled and executed: > EXEC SQL AT conn1 DECLARE stmt STATEMENT; > EXEC SQL AT conn2 EXECUTE stmt INTO ..; Currently line 2 will execute at conn1 without any warnings (and this is the Oracle's spec) but Horiguchi-san says it is non-obvious. So I added a precompiler-warning when the above situation. More discussion might be needed here, but this is not main part. About 0005, see previous discussion: > Since we don't allow descriptors with the same name even if they are > for the different connections, I think we can set the current > connection if any (which is set either by AT option or statement-bound > one) to i->connection silently if i->connection is NULL in > lookup_descriptor(). What do you think about this? How do you think? Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
v04-0001-move-toplevel.patch
Description: v04-0001-move-toplevel.patch
v04-0002-allow-deallocate.patch
Description: v04-0002-allow-deallocate.patch
v04-0003-allow-describe.patch
Description: v04-0003-allow-describe.patch
v04-0004-add-warning-in-check_declared_list.patch
Description: v04-0004-add-warning-in-check_declared_list.patch
v04-0005-descriptor.patch
Description: v04-0005-descriptor.patch
v04-0006-add-test.patch
Description: v04-0006-add-test.patch
