On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:48:07PM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > No, of course not. And sorry for not being precise enough, I only > objected to the prediction part, but I agree, I take the objection > back. I guess it's as difficult for Peter to understand why this is > offensive as it is for me to not see it as such.
OK, good. > > Let me be practical here --- the more someone has to be chased for a > > reply, the less confidence they have in that person. If the RMT > > contacts you about something, and obviously they have had to take > > usual > > efforts to contact you, the more it is on you to give a full report > > and > > a timeline of when you will address the issue. If they had to chase > > you > > around, and you gave them a short answer, the less confidence they > > have > > in this getting resolved in a timely manner. > > Again agreed, please keep in mind, though, that I didn't notice I was > being chased until Peter's first email. I was asked by the RMT to contact one of your employees, and I did, to tell you that the RMT was looking for feedback from you on an ecpg issue. Not sure if that was before or after Peter's email. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
