> On 6 Aug 2021, at 21:01, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Are you going to commit these?
Absolutely, a combination of unplanned home renovations and vacations changed my plans a bit recently. > Note that with release wraps scheduled for Monday, we are probably > already past the time when it'd be wise to push anything that has > a significant chance of introducing portability issues. There's > just not much time to deal with it if the buildfarm shows problems. > So unless you intend this as HEAD-only, I'd counsel waiting for the > release window to pass. Until there is an animal running OpenSSL 3.0.0 in the buildfarm I think this should be HEAD only. Further down the line we need to support OpenSSL 3 in all backbranches IMO since they are all equally likely to be compiled against it, but not until we can regularly test against it in the farm. -- Daniel Gustafsson https://vmware.com/
