> I think that in cases where there's not a semantic hazard involved,
> we'd usually have pulled up the subquery so that this is all moot
> anyway.
>

I get your point with this statement. Things driven by this idea look
practical and lucky.  But for the UniqueKey stuff, we are not
that lucky.

SELECT pk FROM t;  -- Maintain the UniqueKey would be not necessary.

However

SELECT DISTINCT pk FROM (SELECT volatile_f(a), pk from t) WHERE ..;

Maintaining the UniqueKey in subquery is necessary since it is useful outside.

-- 
Best Regards
Andy Fan (https://www.aliyun.com/)


Reply via email to