Hi, On 2021-07-23 13:42:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > ... that said, I wonder why would we do this in the thread_test program > > rather than in configure itself. Wouldn't it make more sense for the > > configure test to be skipped altogether (marking the result as > > thread-safe) when running under thread sanitizer, if there's a way to > > detect that? > > TBH, I wonder why we don't just nuke thread_test.c altogether. > Is it still useful in 2021? Machines that still need > --disable-thread-safety can doubtless be counted without running > out of fingers, and I think their owners can be expected to know > that they need that.
+1. And before long it might be time to remove support for systems without threads... Greetings, Andres Freund
