On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 08:27:02PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I have to wonder if there really *is* a use case for CLUSTER in the > first place on regular tables, let alone on partitioned tables, which > are likely to be large and thus take a lot of time. What justifies > spending so much time on this implementation? My impression is that > CLUSTER is pretty much a fringe command nowadays, because of the access > exclusive lock required. > > Does anybody actually use it?
Yeah, I am not getting really excited about doing anything here either. I thought for some time about the interactions with indisclustered and partitioned tables, but anything I could come up with felt clunky. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
