On 2021-Jul-16, David Rowley wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 20:35, Japin Li <japi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > When I fix a bug about ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name) [1], Ranier > > > Vilela > > > finds that ReplicationSlotValidateName() has redundant strlen() call, > > > Since it's > > > not related to that problem, so I start a new thread to discuss it. > > I think this is a waste of time. The first strlen() call is just > checking for an empty string. I imagine all compilers would just > optimise that to checking if the first char is '\0';
I could find the following idioms 95 times: var[0] == '\0' 146 times: *var == '\0' 35 times: strlen(var) == 0 Resp. git grep "[a-zA-Z_]*\[0\] == '\\\\0" git grep "\*[a-zA-Z_]* == '\\\\0" git grep "strlen([^)]*) == 0" See https://postgr.es/m/13847.1587332...@sss.pgh.pa.us about replacing strlen with a check on first byte being zero. So still not Ranier's patch, but rather the attached. I doubt this change is worth committing on its own, though, since performance-wise it doesn't matter at all; if somebody were to make it so that all "strlen(foo) == 0" occurrences were changed to use the test on byte 0, that could be said to be establishing a consistent style, which might be more pallatable. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Just treat us the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance for ignorance." (Michael Brusser)
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/slot.c b/src/backend/replication/slot.c index 33b85d86cc..d56f1b76bc 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/slot.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/slot.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ ReplicationSlotValidateName(const char *name, int elevel) { const char *cp; - if (strlen(name) == 0) + if (name[0] == '\0') { ereport(elevel, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_NAME),