Le mardi 13 juillet 2021, 06:44:12 CEST David Rowley a écrit : > I've attached the updated patches.
The approach of building a pathkey for the first order by we find, then appending to it as needed seems sensible but I'm a bit worried about users starting to rely on this as an optimization. Even if we don't document it, people may start to change the order of their target lists to "force" a specific sort on the lower nodes. How confident are we that we won't change this or that we will be willing to break it ? Generating all possible pathkeys and costing the resulting plans would be too expensive, but maybe a more "stable" (and limited) approach would be fine, like generating the pathkeys only if every ordered aggref shares the same prefix. I don't think there would be any ambiguity here. -- Ronan Dunklau
