Em ter., 13 de jul. de 2021 às 15:26, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
> Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: > > Em ter., 13 de jul. de 2021 às 11:29, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > escreveu: > >> I think you're missing my main point, which is that it seems certain > that > >> there are corner cases that do this *now*. I'm proposing that we > redefine > >> this as not being a crash case, full stop. > > > I agree with Laurenz Albe, that on Debug builds, *printf with NULL, must > > crash. > > Did you see my followup? I am trying. > The vast majority of live systems do not do > that, so we are accomplishing nothing of value by insisting it's a > crash-worthy bug. > I agreed. > I flat out don't agree that "crash on debug builds but it's okay on > production" is a useful way to define this. I spend way too much > time already on bug reports that only manifest with asserts enabled. > I understand. Bug reports will decrease, because of that, people will lose interest and motivation to report, because (null), it doesn't seem like a serious error and my server didn't crash. It's a tricky tradeoff. regards, Ranier Vilela
