Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 12:25:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's easy enough in v13 and up, which have 8f4fb4c64 so that
>> Solution.pm looks like this. We could make it consistent in older
>> branches by manually hacking pg_config.h.win32 ... but I'm wondering
>> if the smarter plan wouldn't be to back-patch 8f4fb4c64.
> ... I am not sure that the potential maintenance gain is worth
> poking at the stable branches, to be honest.
Fair enough. I wasn't very eager to do the legwork on that, either,
given that the issue is (so far) only cosmetic.
regards, tom lane
