"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > "enable_nodememoization" would work for me
That seems pretty unreadable. Maybe just "enable_memoization"?
Really if we're going to do something here, we can't merely mess
with the GUC name. David had expressed a willingness to rename
everything about ResultCache some time ago, but nobody stepped up
with a better name.
Maybe name the plan node type Memoize, and the GUC "enable_memoize"?
regards, tom lane
