Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The existing code tried to do syscache lookups in an already-failed
>> transaction, which is problematic to say the least.
> Why didn't the assertion in SearchCatCacheInternal() catch this? Was
> this code never actually tested?
It wasn't tested under conditions in which a catalog lookup would
be at real risk of failing --- and I'm not sure that we have any
way to do that mechanically. See discussion downthread about when
a transaction could be considered "failed".
regards, tom lane
