Dear Hackers, I revised my patch.
> Please also ensure that you're generating the patch against git HEAD. > The cfbot shows it as failing to apply, likely because you're looking > at something predating ad8305a43d1890768a613d3fb586b44f17360f29. Maybe there was something wrong with my local environment. Sorry. > However, I perfectly agree that it's very difficult for users to find a > problem from the message. > I will try to add information to it in the next patch. I added such a message and some tests, but I began to think this is strange. Now I'm wondering why the connection is checked in some DESCRIPTOR-related statements? In my understanding connection name is not used in ECPGallocate_desc(), ECPGdeallocate_desc(), ECPGget_desc() and so on. Hence I think lookup_descriptor() and drop_descriptor() can be removed. This idea can solve your first argument. > You're right. This is very stupid program. I'll combine them into one. Check_declared_list() was moved to stmt:ECPGDescribe rule. Some similar rules still remain in ecpg.trailer, but INPUT/OUTPUT statements have different rules and actions and I cannot combine well. Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
v02-0001-fix-deallocate-describe.patch
Description: v02-0001-fix-deallocate-describe.patch
v02-0002-add-test.patch
Description: v02-0002-add-test.patch
