On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:25:47PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 09:01:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > so we are talking about scans in parallel, so I think it is plural. Wrong? > > I think the "type" of scan being referenced is a "parallel" type, right ? > So there's only one type, but multiple scans. > So I think it should say "this type" of scan, but it seems like it's not only > easier but generally better to say > > | postgres_fdw supports parallel scans if async_capable > > >> Prevent the containment operators (<@ and @>) for intarray from using GiST > >> indexes (Tom Lane) > >> Remove deprecated containment operators @ and ~ for built-in geometric > >> data types and contrib modules cube, hstore, intarray, and seg (Justin > >> Pryzby) > >> For example, disregard ^ in its expansion in \1 in (^\d+).*\1. > >> Add point operators <<| and |>> to be strictly above/below geometry (Emre > >> Hasegeli) > >> Previously >^ and <^ were marked as performing this test, but non-point > >> geometric operators used these operators for non-strict comparisons, > >> leading to confusion. The old operators still exist but will be eventually > >> removed. > > > What markup is missing? > > I mean markup for the operators, like <literal><@</literal> > > > Uh, why? I don't see the release notes as a place to explain how to use > > Postgres features. > > Because the normal way to show foreign keys (\d) doesn't show them - the > references are shown by the function.
OK, agreed. Here is an updated applied patch. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml index e96206f899..03ee36867a 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/release-14.sgml @@ -58,8 +58,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> --> <para> - Prevent the containment operators (<@ and @>) for <xref - linkend="intarray"/> from using GiST indexes (Tom Lane) + Prevent the containment operators (<literal><@</literal> and + <literal>@></literal>) for <xref linkend="intarray"/> from using + GiST indexes (Tom Lane) </para> <para> @@ -78,8 +79,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> --> <para> - Remove deprecated containment operators @ and ~ for built-in - <link linkend="functions-geometry">geometric data types</link> and + Remove deprecated containment operators <literal>@</literal> + and <literal>~</literal> for built-in <link + linkend="functions-geometry">geometric data types</link> and contrib modules <xref linkend="cube"/>, <xref linkend="hstore"/>, <xref linkend="intarray"/>, and <xref linkend="seg"/> (Justin Pryzby) </para> @@ -1216,7 +1218,7 @@ Author: Etsuro Fujita <efuj...@postgresql.org> <para> <link linkend="postgres-fdw"><application>postgres_fdw</application></link> - supports these type of scans if <literal>async_capable</literal> + supports this type of scan if <literal>async_capable</literal> is set. </para> </listitem> @@ -2398,7 +2400,9 @@ Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> </para> <para> - This helps <acronym>GUI</acronym> tools analyze the system tables. + This helps <acronym>GUI</acronym> tools analyze the + system tables. The constraints are visible using <link + linkend="functions-aclitem-fn-table">pg_get_catalog_foreign_keys()</link>. </para> </listitem> @@ -2495,15 +2499,16 @@ Author: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> <para> Add <link linkend="functions-geometry">point operators</link> - <<| and |>> to be strictly above/below geometry - (Emre Hasegeli) + <literal><<|</literal> and <literal>|>></literal> + to be strictly above/below geometry (Emre Hasegeli) </para> <para> - Previously >^ and <^ were marked as performing this test, but - non-point geometric operators used these operators for non-strict - comparisons, leading to confusion. The old operators still exist - but will be eventually removed. ACCURATE? + Previously <literal>>^</literal> and <literal><^</literal> + were marked as performing this test, but non-point geometric + operators used these operators for non-strict comparisons, leading + to confusion. The old operators still exist but will be eventually + removed. ACCURATE? </para> </listitem>