On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 01:04:18PM +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: > On 5/17/21 8:56 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2021-05-17 20:14:40 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: >>> I was also wondering if: >>> >>> * We should keep the old behavior in case pg_resetwal -x is being used >>> without -u? (The proposed patch does not set an arbitrary oldestXID >>> anymore in case -x is used) >> I don't think we should. I don't see anything in the old behaviour worth >> maintaining.
So, pg_resetwal logic with the oldest XID assignment is causing some problem here. This open item is opened for some time now and it is idle for a couple of weeks. It looks that we have some solution drafted, to be able to move forward, with the following things (no patches yet): - More robustness safety checks in procarray.c. - A rework of oldestXid in pg_resetwal. Is there somebody working on that? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
