Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:04 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> On top of that, not reacting on signals can be
>> interesting to keep as a behavior for developers?
> Yeah, it can be useful at times as it enables debugging even when the
> postmaster dies.
Dunno ... I cannot recall ever having had that as a debugging requirement
in a couple of decades worth of PG bug-chasing. If the postmaster is
dying, you generally want to deal with that before bothering with child
processes. Moreover, child processes that don't go awy when the
postmaster does are a very nasty problem, because they could screw up
subsequent debugging work.
regards, tom lane
