On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 8:16 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:25 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Checking the git history, this was fixed in f560209c6, which also
> >> included some other mostly-cosmetic cleanup.  I'm inclined to
> >> propose back-patching that whole commit, rather than allowing the
> >> code in exec_replication_command() to diverge in different branches.
> >> It looks like it applies cleanly as far back as v10.  Maybe something
> >> could be done for 9.6 as well, but since that branch is so close to
> >> EOL, I doubt it's worth spending extra effort on it.
>
> > +1.
>
> Done that way.
>

Thanks!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.


Reply via email to