On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:04 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:25:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Okay, I'll change this in back branches and HEAD to keep the code > >> consistent, or do you think it is better to retain the order in HEAD > >> as it is and just change it for back-branches? > > > > As I said, I'd keep the natural ordering in HEAD. > > Yes, please keep the items in an alphabetical order on HEAD, and just > have the new item at the bottom of the enum in the back-branches. > That's the usual practice. >
Okay, I have back-patched the change till v11 because before that REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_SPEC_ABORT is already at the end. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
