Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Perhaps one day we could add a
> secondary file, not updated by that mechanism, that holds a manually
> maintained list for cases like this.
Yeah, the comments in pgindent already speculate about that. For
now, those include and exclude lists are short enough that keeping
them inside the script seems a lot easier than building tooling
to get them from somewhere else.
The big problem in my mind, which would not be alleviated in the
slightest by having a separate file, is that it'd be easy to miss
removing entries if they ever become obsolete.
regards, tom lane
