Hi, On 2021-06-15 19:26:25 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Going forward it wouldn't be a problem, but back-patching isolation > test cases might find it annoying. On the other hand, my nearby > patch to improve isolation test stability is already going to create > issues of that sort. (Unless, dare I say it, we back-patch that.)
It might be worth to back-patch - aren't there some back branch cases of test instability? And perhaps more importantly, I'm sure we'll encounter cases of writing new isolation tests in the course of fixing bugs that we'd want to backpatch that are hard to make reliable without the new features? Greetings, Andres Freund
