Hi, On 2021-06-15 12:51:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > Oh, maybe I'm the one who misunderstood... > > So, it's well over a year later, and so far as I can see exactly > nothing has been done about snapshot_too_old's problems. > > I never liked that feature to begin with, and I would be very > glad to undertake the task of ripping it out. If someone thinks > this should not happen, please commit to fixing it ... and not > "eventually".
I still think that's the most reasonable course. I actually like the feature, but I don't think a better implementation of it would share much if any of the current infrastructure. Greetings, Andres Freund
