On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 12:06 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:44 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:34 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I think the test in this patch is quite similar to what Noah has > > > pointed in the nearby thread [1] to be failing at some intervals. Can > > > you also please once verify the same and if we can expect similar > > > failures here then we might want to consider dropping the test in this > > > patch for now? We can always come back to it once we find a good > > > solution to make it pass consistently. > > > > test insert-conflict-do-nothing ... ok 646 ms > > test insert-conflict-do-nothing-2 ... ok 1994 ms > > test insert-conflict-do-update ... ok 1786 ms > > test insert-conflict-do-update-2 ... ok 2689 ms > > test insert-conflict-do-update-3 ... ok 851 ms > > test insert-conflict-specconflict ... FAILED 3695 ms > > test delete-abort-savept ... ok 1238 ms > > > > Yeah, this is the same test that we have used base for our test so > > let's not push this test until it becomes stable. > > Patches without test case. >
Pushed! -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
