On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 9:12 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> So far as I can find, just about everyplace that deals with replication
> connections has slipshod error reporting. An example from worker.c is
>
> LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn = walrcv_connect(MySubscription->conninfo,
> true,
> MySubscription->name, &err);
> if (LogRepWorkerWalRcvConn == NULL)
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errmsg("could not connect to the publisher: %s", err)));
>
> Because of the lack of any errcode() call, this failure will be reported
> as XX000 ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR, which is surely not appropriate.
> worker.c is in good company though, because EVERY caller of walrcv_connect
> is equally slipshod.
>
> Shall we just use ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE for these failures, or
> would it be better to invent another SQLSTATE code? Arguably,
> ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE is meant for failures of client connections;
> but on the other hand, a replication connection is a sort of client.
>
Your reasoning sounds good to me. So, +1 for using ERRCODE_CONNECTION_FAILURE.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
