On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:16 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes:
> > What about "Range/Multirange Functions and Operators"?
>
> Better than a comma, I guess. Personally I didn't have a
> problem with the form with two "ands".
Thank you. I propose to push the slash option because it both evades
double "and" and it's aligned with sibling section headers (we have
"Date/Time Functions and Operators").
Any objections?
------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index c7c2a2d11f7..cae5c990fa1 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
@@ -18165,7 +18165,7 @@ SELECT NULLIF(value, '(none)') ...
</sect1>
<sect1 id="functions-range">
- <title>Range Functions and Operators</title>
+ <title>Range/Multirange Functions and Operators</title>
<para>
See <xref linkend="rangetypes"/> for an overview of range types.
