On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Geoff Winkless wrote: > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 15:35 Alvaro Herrera, <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:847: * has. If it's an MD5 hash, we must do >> MD5 authentication, and if it's a >> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:848: * SCRAM secret, we must do SCRAM >> authentication. > > Not sure whether you were just listing examples and you weren't suggesting > this should be changed, but surely "SCRAM" is pronounced "scram" and is > thus "a SCRAM"?
RFC 5802 uses "a SCRAM something" commonly, but "a SCRAM" alone does not make sense: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802 The sentences quoted above look fine to me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
