On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:29:30 +0200 (CEST) Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> > Bonjour Michaël, > > Here is an updated patch. While having a look at Kyotaro-san patch, I > noticed that the aggregate stuff did not print the last aggregate. I think > that it is a side effect of switching the precision from per-second to > per-µs. I've done an attempt at also fixing that which seems to work. This is just out of curiosity. + while ((next = agg->start_time + agg_interval * INT64CONST(1000000)) <= now) I can find the similar code to convert "seconds" to "us" using casting like end_time = threads[0].create_time + (int64) 1000000 * duration; or next_report = last_report + (int64) 1000000 * progress; Is there a reason use INT64CONST instead of (int64)? Do these imply the same effect? Sorry, if this is a dumb question... Regards, Yugo Nagata -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
