(Sorry for the noise on the old thread..) At Mon, 07 Jun 2021 16:54:49 +0900, Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro.yamada...@nttcom.co.jp> wrote in > On 2021/06/07 16:31, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > At Mon, 07 Jun 2021 16:13:08 +0900, Tatsuro Yamada > > <tatsuro.yamada...@nttcom.co.jp> wrote in > >> I just noticed that this thread is still tied to another thread > >> (it's not an independent thread). To fix that, it may be better to > >> create a new thread again. > > Mmm. Maybe my mailer automatically inserted In-Reply-To field for the > > cited messsage. Do we (the two of us) bother re-launching a new > > thread? > > > The reason I suggested it was because I thought it might be > confusing if the threads were not independent when registered in > a commitfest. If that is not a problem, then I'm fine with it as > is. :-D
(You can freely do that, too:p) Hmm. I found that the pgsql-hackers archive treats the new thread as a part of the old thread, so CF-app would do the same. Anyway I re-launched a new standalone thread. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210607.173108.348241508233844279.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
