Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > My suspicion was correct. Fix pushed.
Great, thanks. Do we need to worry about back-patching that? It seems only accidental if no existing back-branch test cases hit this. regards, tom lane
Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > My suspicion was correct. Fix pushed.
Great, thanks. Do we need to worry about back-patching that? It seems only accidental if no existing back-branch test cases hit this. regards, tom lane