On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 12:55, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > > út 1. 6. 2021 v 12:53 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> napsal: >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 10:44, Pavel Stehule wrote: >>> Operators use schemas too. I cannot imagine any work with operators with >>> the necessity of explicit schemas. >> >> I thought operators are mostly installed in the public schema, in which case >> that wouldn't be a problem, or am I missing something here? > > It is inconsistency - if I use schema for almost all, then can be strange to > store operators just to public.
I don't agree. If an extension provides functionality that is supposed to be used by all parts of the system, then I think the 'public' schema is a good choice. Using schemas only for the sake of separation, i.e. adding the schemas to the search_path, to make them implicitly available, is IMO an ugly hack, since if just wanting separation without fully-qualifying, then packaging the objects are separate extensions is much cleaner. That way you can easily see what objects are provided by each extension using \dx+. /Joel
