Greetings, * Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > OK, that's what I thought. We already expose the clog and fsm, so > exposing the hint bits seems acceptable. If everyone agrees, I will > adjust my patch to not WAL log hint bit changes.
Robert pointed out that it's not just hint bits where this is happening though, but it can also happen with btree line pointer arrays. Even if we were entirely comfortable accepting that the hint bits are leaked because of this, leaking the btree line pointer array doesn't seem like it could possibly be acceptable.. I've not run down that code myself, but I don't have any reason to doubt Robert's assessment. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
