Greetings, * Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > On 2021-05-25 16:34:10 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > The nonce does need to be absolutely unique for a given encryption key and > > therefore needs to be global in some form. > > You can achieve that without a global counter though, by prepending a > per-relation nonce with some local counter. > > I'm doubtful it's worth it though - compared to all the other costs, one > shared atomic increment is pretty OK price to pay I think.
Yes, I tend to agree. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
