From: Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:11 AM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com > <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > For some big data scenario, we sometimes transfer data from one table(only > store not expired data) > > to another table(historical data) for future analysis. > > In this case, we import data into historical table regularly(could be one > > day or > half a day), > > And the data is likely to be imported with date label specified, then all > > of the > data to be > > imported this time belong to the same partition which partition by time > > range. > > Is directing that data directly into the appropriate partition not an > acceptable solution to address this particular use case? Yeah, I know > we should avoid encouraging users to perform DML directly on > partitions, but...
Yes, I want to make/keep it possible that application developers can be unaware of partitions. I believe that's why David-san, Alvaro-san, and you have made great efforts to improve partitioning performance. So, I'm +1 for what Hou-san is trying to achieve. Is there something you're concerned about? The amount and/or complexity of added code? Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
