On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 9:06 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:06 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:41 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> Few comments:
> 1.
> + # Ensure a transactional logical decoding message shows up on the slot
> + $node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION tap_sub
> DISABLE");
>
> After you have encapsulated this command in the function, the above
> comment doesn't make sense because we do this for both transactional
> and non-transactional messages. I suggest we can change it to
> something like: "This is done to ensure a logical decoding message is
> shown up on the slot".
>
> 2.
> +# Setup the subscription before checking pg_logical_slot_peek_binary_changes
> +sub setup_subscription
>
> I think here the functionality is more for the catchup of
> subscription, so it might be better to name the function as
> subscription_catchup or catchup_subscription. I think you can expand
> the comments atop this function a bit as suggested by Michael.
>
One more point:
+ $node_publisher->wait_for_catchup('tap_sub');
+
+ # Ensure a transactional logical decoding message shows up on the slot
+ $node_subscriber->safe_psql('postgres', "ALTER SUBSCRIPTION tap_sub DISABLE");
+
+ # wait for the replication connection to drop from the publisher
+ $node_publisher->poll_query_until('postgres',
+ "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM pg_catalog.pg_replication_slots WHERE
slot_name = 'tap_sub' AND active='f'", 1);
In the above sequence, wait_for_catchup will query pg_stat_replication
whereas after disabling subscription we are checking
pg_replication_slots. I understand from your explanation why we can't
rely on pg_stat_replication after DISABLE but it might be better to
check that the slot is active before disabling it. I think currently,
the test assumes that, isn't it better to have an explicit check for
that?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
