Greetings, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > On 5/13/21 7:38 PM, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > >> I've attached a small patch that allows specifying only direct members > >> of a group in pg_hba.conf. > > > Do we really want to be creating two classes of role membership? > > Yeah, this seems to be going against the clear meaning of the > SQL spec. I realize you can argue that pg_hba.conf doesn't have > to follow the spec, but it doesn't seem like a terribly good idea > to interpret role membership differently in different places.
Agreed. The lack of any particular justifcation for wanting this isn't a useful way to propose a patch either. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
