On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:43 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:00 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Done that way.
> >
> > PSA patch.
>
> Your changes look good. About changing the "non-negative integer" to
> "greater than or equal to zero", there is another thread [1], I am not
> sure that have we concluded anything there yet.
>
> - pg_log_error("parallel vacuum degree must be a non-negative integer");
> + pg_log_error("parallel workers for vacuum must be greater than or
> equal to zero");
> exit(1);
>
> [1]
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/os0pr01mb5716415335a06b489f1b3a8194...@os0pr01mb5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Yeah. Tom proposed if (foo <= 0) { error:"foo must be greater than
zero" } at [1]. In the subsequent messages both Michael and I agreed
with that. But we also have cases like if (foo < 0) for which I think
{ error:"foo must be greater than or equal to zero" } would be better,
similar to what's proposed. Please feel free to provide your thoughts
there in that thread.
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/621822.1620655780%40sss.pgh.pa.us
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
