On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:44 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 for the idea. I did not read the complete patch but while reading
> > through the patch, I noticed that you using elevel as LOG for printing
> > the stack trace. But I think the backend whose pid you have passed,
> > the connected client to that backend might not have superuser
> > privileges and if you use elevel LOG then that message will be sent to
> > that connected client as well and I don't think that is secure. So
> > can we use LOG_SERVER_ONLY so that we can prevent
> > it from sending to the client.
>
> True, we should use LOG_SERVER_ONLY and not send any logs to the client.
I further tend to think that, is it correct to log queries with LOG
level when log_statement GUC is set? Or should it also be
LOG_SERVER_ONLY?
/* Log immediately if dictated by log_statement */
if (check_log_statement(parsetree_list))
{
ereport(LOG,
(errmsg("statement: %s", query_string),
errhidestmt(true),
errdetail_execute(parsetree_list)));
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
