On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 5:11 PM Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> V2 works. Thanks for fixing this quickly, I think you can add a >> comment for the new error condition you added. > > Added comments. PFA v3
Thanks. + * + * For indexes with INCLUDEd columns we do not know whether we can reduce + * index tuple size by suffixing its key part or we will go into the + * endless loop on pick-split (in case included columns data is big enough INCLUDEd -> why you have used a mixed case here? -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
