Hi, On 2021-05-10 14:06:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Hm. But constantly flushing the caches should mean that they're never > populated with very many entries at one time, which ought to forestall > that, at least to some extent.
That's probably true... > I wonder if there's anything we could do to make ResetCatalogCache > faster? It wouldn't help much for normal execution of course, > but it might do something to bring CCA testing time down out of > the stratosphere. We could make the hashtables shrink, not just grow... There's also the issue that most people, I assume, run CCA tests with -O0. In a quick test that does make a big difference in e.g. ResetCatalogCache(). I just added a function specific annotation to optimize just that function and the overall time in my test shrank 10% or so. Greetings, Andres Freund
