Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 27.04.21 18:16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That's kind of a lot of complication, and inefficiency, for a corner case
>> that may never arise in practice. We've ignored the risk for default
>> expressions, and AFAIR have yet to receive any field complaints about it.
>> So maybe it's okay to do the same for SQL-style function bodies, at least
>> for now.
>>> Another option would be that we disallow this at creation time.
>> Don't like that one much. The backend shouldn't be in the business
>> of rejecting valid commands just because pg_dump might be unable
>> to cope later.
> Since this is listed as an open item, I want to clarify that I'm
> currently not planning to work on this, based on this discussion.
> Certainly something to look into sometime later, but it's not in my
> plans right now.
Right, I concur with moving it to the "won't fix" category.
regards, tom lane
