On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:45 AM Chapman Flack <c...@anastigmatix.net> wrote: > I guess I was thinking, but forgot to convey to the keyboard, that the > existence of a non-empty extra_check_hooks chain on a SUSET GUC (which > could only have been attached from a shared preload library) would > implicitly change SUSET to mean settable whenever accepted by the hook(s).
Sure, but the hook still needs a way to know which users are entitled to set the GUC. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
