On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 10:43 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:49 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looking into this again, why not as shown below? IMHO, this way the
> > code will be logically the same as it was before the patch, basically
> > why to process an extra statement ( *volatility_item = defel;) if we
> > have already decided to error.
>
> I changed my mind given the concerns raised on removing the goto
> statements. We could just do as below:
Okay, that make sense.
> diff --git a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
> b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
> index 9548287217..1f1c74c379 100644
> --- a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c
> @@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ compute_common_attribute(ParseState *pstate,
> duplicate_error:
> ereport(ERROR,
> (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> - errmsg("conflicting or redundant options"),
> + errmsg("option \"%s\" specified more than once",
> defel->defname),
> parser_errposition(pstate, defel->location)));
> return false; /* keep compiler quiet */
>
> I'm not attaching above one line change as a patch, maybe Vignesh can
> merge this into the main patch.
+1
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
