Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> writes:
>> On 28 Apr 2021, at 17:09, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> + pg_fatal("Your installation contains system-defined composite
>> type(s) in user tables.\n"
>> + "These type OIDs are not stable across
>> PostgreSQL versions,\n"
>> + "so this cluster cannot currently be upgraded.
>> You can\n"
>> + "remove the problem tables and restart the
>> upgrade.\n"
>> + "A list of the problem columns is in the
>> file:\n"
> Would it be helpful to inform the user that they can alter/drop just the
> problematic columns as a potentially less scary alternative to dropping the
> entire table?
This wording is copied-and-pasted from the other similar tests. I agree
that it's advocating a solution that might be overkill, but if we change
it we should also change the existing messages. I don't mind doing
that in HEAD; less sure about the back branches, as (I think) these
are translatable strings.
Thoughts?
>> - * The type of interest might be wrapped in a domain, array,
>> + * The types of interest might be wrapped in a domain, array,
> Shouldn't this be "type(s)” as in the other changes here?
Fair enough.
regards, tom lane
