On 2021-Apr-28, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I propose the attached patch to shake up the wording in the connection type > section of pg_hba.conf.sample a bit. After the hostgssenc part was added > on, the whole thing became a bit wordy, and it's also a bit inaccurate for > example in that the current wording for "host" appears to say that it does > not apply to GSS-encrypted connections.
Yeah, that's a clear improvement. Looking at it now, I wonder how well do the "hostno" options work. If I say "hostnogssenc", is an SSL-encrypted socket good? If I say "hostnossl", is a GSS-encrypted socket good? If so, how does that make sense? -- Álvaro Herrera 39°49'30"S 73°17'W "Pensar que el espectro que vemos es ilusorio no lo despoja de espanto, sólo le suma el nuevo terror de la locura" (Perelandra, C.S. Lewis)
